| By
Craig Sholley
The Mountain Gorillas of
Rwanda survived a horrific war that killed an estimated 750,000
people. In the midst of chaos
and catastrophe that affected every family in this small and
impoverished African nation,
one of the world’s most endangered primates was considered
important enough to protect.
Such
an incomprehensible accomplishment is best understood
in the context of creative conservation work
that preceded the outbreak of Rwanda’s human disaster.
A key part of this success story is “ecotourism,”
a natural-history approach to travel that generates
money to support conservation, allowing wildlife
and habitats to “pay their own way.” This, in turn,
convinces governments and local people to develop
well-designed protection programs.
Ecotourism encompasses a
commitment to preserving natural
resources and a sense of social responsibility toward
local communities. It is a relatively new concept
now embraced by most major wildlife and habitat
conservation organizations throughout the world. The ultimate objective
of ecotourism,
unlike more traditional types of tourism, is to explore wild and sometimes
exotic places
while protecting, threatened and endangered habitats, wildlife and cultures.
Travel programs
are founded on sound scientific and anthropological knowledge, and visits
to our last great
wild places are carefully controlled.
If approached wisely, ecotourism
can be a reasonable antidote to population and economic pressures
exerted on the earth’s natural resources. It can be constructive conservation,
involving local residents and
enabling them to realize the economic benefits of dealing with
the realities of finding sometimes
large, dangerous and destructive wild animals literally in
their backyards.
Ecotourism that’s misused
can also be destructive. It’s sometimes used as a buzzword to
market trips by those with little
understanding of the concept. For them ecotourism may be a
golden goose, another popular
travel trend. But unregulated tourism can kill that golden
goose by harming natural resources.
What are the essential ingredients
of sound ecotourism? They are as much a philosophy as a methodology:
The top priority of an ecotour
is to safeguard wild habitats and fragile cultures. Participants
do not impose themselves on places and people they visit; they do not
disturb normal animal behaviors
and cultural patterns. Ecotourism
is travel with an ethic. It is sensitive to host countries, with policies
and regulations
about how developing nations, “primitive cultures” and endangered wildlife
are perceived and treated.
Ecotours are based on careful
field research and coordinated with local governments and
people. Ongoing tourism results in mutual rewards that justify conservation
efforts. Local people benefit
from increased tourism revenue and jobs; trip participants
benefit from their experiences and the satisfaction of knowing they are
part of conservation.
Ecotourism is sustainable, with
programs, accommodations, transportation and other components
responsibly developed for the long term. This also means training
governments and local people
who will ultimately run the programs. Ecotours
are educational, led by experienced conservationists, scientists, and
experienced naturalists. Participants
ideally conclude their travels with a greater appreciation
and understanding of the places they have encountered. Whether
ecotourism is participatory – with the travelers involved in a project
to enhance knowledge
and/or conservation efforts – or simply observational, the goal is
to leave each destination unscathed.
It was ecotourism and its
regard for conservation that ultimately helped the mountain
gorillas. Throughout the 1980s
well-regulated gorilla tourism provided Rwanda with foreign
currency and a rationale for
forest and gorilla protection. Receipts from Volcano National
Park, Rwanda’s gorilla sanctuary
(a one-hour experience with the mountain gorillas cost an
average of $150 during this
period) and additional tourism profits rocketed past more
traditional Rwandan money earners
to make tourism in 1990 - just before the war began - the
country’s second-most important source of foreign exchange.
By the end of the 1980s the
mountain gorillas were considered a national treasure well
worthy of protection. This attitude,
coupled with a display of tremendous courage and devotion
by many Rwandans, helped the great apes survive.
Based on the success of the
African Wildlife Foundation’s leadership role in the Mountain
Gorilla Project (and subsequently
the International Gorilla Conservation Program - IGCP) and
its utilization of “tourism as a conservation strategy” in Rwanda, AWF
has consciously continued
to use this concept elsewhere in its Heartlands Programs in east and southern
Africa. Generally, the strategy
has been molded into AWF’s Conservation Service Centers (CSC)
programs. The CSCs help people get value from wildlife, both within and
outside African
Heartlands. CSCs offer expertise in business planning, law, entrepreneurship,
and community
economic development – as well as wildlife ecology and land-use planning.
Working with many partners,
CSCs help create profitable ventures based on the sustainable
use of local wildlife and wild
lands. They help communities figure out what environmentally
friendly business options they
may have and how to develop a sustainable business plan – or
work with private corporations
in a mutually beneficial manner. AWF CSC offices are based
close to wildlife, tourists,
and communities. They are located in Nairobi, Kenya, Arusha,
Tanzania, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe,
and White River, South Africa. At each location, collaboration
between AWF, local communities, and wildlife authorities are working to
ensure the survival
of African wildlife and the future prosperity of African peoples.
Craig Sholley directed AWF’s
Mountain Gorilla Project in Rwanda from 1987 to 1990. He then joined International
Expeditions, an organization widely known for its ecotourism programming.
Craig was a board member of The International Ecotourism Society, and remains
on the Society’s Scientific Advisory Board. He recently rejoined AWF as
a full-time staff member.
|
|